Map the Existing Process
Review issue categories, study milestones, sponsor and CRO responsibilities and the systems that already hold the data.
Solutions in Practice / Interactive Working Example
One Place for
Data Review Issues.
Track comments, QC revisions and decisions across sponsor and CRO teams. See who owns the next action and which version the reviewer accepted.
Try the Issue DeskINNOVIZZ / Working Example
Biometrics Issue Desk
Study IVZ-DEMO-021 Data Management
Local demonstration. Role views simulate visibility; they are not security controls. Changes reset on refresh. Use sample information.
Try the Handoff
Open IM-104. As the CRO, submit v3 with a correction note and check reference. Switch to the reviewer to accept it or request another revision.
A Workflow Fitted to Your Team
Start with One
Recurring Handoff.
A useful implementation begins with the issue log and review process your team already uses. Agree who responds, what counts as a correction and who can accept it.
Discuss This WorkflowConnect the Working Record
Define source references, comment visibility, version handling, assignments and review steps in the agreed environment.
Leave a Reviewable Workflow
Scope configuration or source code, role and transition checks, test evidence, an export format and operating guidance. Agree acceptance and support before a build.
Workflow Fit
Fit the Workflow to Your Review Process.
Keep a finding, its comments and each revision together so the next owner can act. Start with the gap in your existing process and the records your reviewers need.
Where This Workflow Fits
Coordinate data-transfer defects, reconciliation findings and QC revisions here. Site queries stay in the designated EDC workflow; formal deviations and CAPA stay in the quality system. References connect the records without changing source data.
Review what your existing platforms already support before adding a new workflow. Scope the implementation around the handoffs and review gaps that remain.
What the Mock Demonstrates
Filtering, assignment, comments, partner visibility, revision submission, review, rework, reopening and a local sample export. The role switch is a preview, not authentication. The history is browser memory, not a secure audit trail.
A production system would require agreed integrations, access enforcement, retention, review controls, testing and validation appropriate to its intended use. No model is running here, and no messages or records leave this browser.