Programmer or Model Proposal
Prepare the mapping, derivation or explanation within the agreed task. Keep source references and unresolved questions visible to the person reviewing it.
Clinical / Platform intelligence + Operational intelligence
Deterministic first. Reviewed always.
Clinical Practice
Home
The INNOVIZZ approach
Define the workflow, approved environment and acceptance criteria with your programming, platform and QA leads. Build in a controlled scope, record the checks and hand over the work your team accepts.
For Clinical buyers planning delivery and validation responsibilities
The working agreement
Four stages
Map the process, constraints, data and baseline. Identify the owner and the reason to change.
Agree the scope, review gates, acceptance tests and operating environment.
Build the agreed workflow. Test normal cases, exceptions and denied actions.
Review acceptance evidence, train the operating team and document how changes will be handled.
Fit before commitment
Missing data ownership, an unstable process or an undefined review responsibility can make automation premature. The useful next step may be a smaller scope or a process fix.
The Working Brief
Follow the work from a first proposal through automated checks, expert review and handover.
Prepare the mapping, derivation or explanation within the agreed task. Keep source references and unresolved questions visible to the person reviewing it.
Run the agreed rules, comparisons and conformance checks against pinned inputs and versions. Record failed and incomplete checks as well as passing results.
Your programmer, statistician, data manager or validation lead accepts the deliverable within their responsibility. Preserve the decision and any approved exceptions before release.
Use approved systems and access under your identity controls. Document hosting, model endpoints, logging and any data movement with IT and QA before implementation.
Receive the agreed source, specifications, test records, operating guidance and training. List client-owned deliverables, pre-existing components, third-party licenses and support terms in the statement of work.
Before You Commission a Build
Start with a free 30-minute scope conversation. Bring a description of the workflow, platform, bottleneck and review owner. No study files are needed for this first call.
One defined workflow. If discovery is needed, the indicative review duration is two to four weeks, subject to scope and access.
Name a workflow owner and the relevant programming, platform and QA reviewers. Agree workshops, access and reviewer availability before starting.
A prioritized plan, readiness gaps, proposed acceptance criteria, and an implementation scope and estimate. Your team keeps the review outputs.
Review a written scope and fee before any paid work. Implementation is a separate decision, with its deliverables, timing and acceptance agreed in advance.
Clinical / Your Next Decision
A fit conversation establishes the problem and prerequisites. A separately scoped review can define the plan, estimate and validation approach before you decide on implementation.
Receive the agreed source or configuration, specifications, test records and operating handover. The statement of work identifies client-owned deliverables, existing INNOVIZZ methods, third-party licenses and support terms.