Clinical / Platform intelligence + Operational intelligence

Deterministic first. Reviewed always.

INNOVIZZ Clinical homeClinical Practice Home
ContactBook a Call (opens Calendly in a new tab)
Explore
Practice
Clinical Overview →

The INNOVIZZ approach

Agree the Review Before the Build Begins.

Define the workflow, approved environment and acceptance criteria with your programming, platform and QA leads. Build in a controlled scope, record the checks and hand over the work your team accepts.

For Clinical buyers planning delivery and validation responsibilities

The working agreement

Four Commitments.

Rules before inference
Use deterministic logic when the task can be specified. Make model-assisted proposals visible where judgment remains.
A named reviewer
Agree who accepts the result, which exceptions they review and how the decision is recorded.
Client-controlled environments
Design for the systems, access rules and operating responsibilities your organization controls.
A written scope
Set deliverables, acceptance criteria and change control before implementation starts.

Four stages

From One Workflow to a Usable Handover.

  1. Discover

    Map the process, constraints, data and baseline. Identify the owner and the reason to change.

  2. Specify

    Agree the scope, review gates, acceptance tests and operating environment.

  3. Implement & Verify

    Build the agreed workflow. Test normal cases, exceptions and denied actions.

  4. Deploy & Hand Over

    Review acceptance evidence, train the operating team and document how changes will be handled.

Method Note: Measuring Workflow Improvement

Fit before commitment

Resolve the Prerequisites Before a Build.

Missing data ownership, an unstable process or an undefined review responsibility can make automation premature. The useful next step may be a smaller scope or a process fix.

The Working Brief

How a Proposal Becomes an Accepted Deliverable.

Follow the work from a first proposal through automated checks, expert review and handover.

01 Responsibilities at Each Review Gate

Programmer or Model Proposal

Prepare the mapping, derivation or explanation within the agreed task. Keep source references and unresolved questions visible to the person reviewing it.

Specified Checks

Run the agreed rules, comparisons and conformance checks against pinned inputs and versions. Record failed and incomplete checks as well as passing results.

Named Acceptance

Your programmer, statistician, data manager or validation lead accepts the deliverable within their responsibility. Preserve the decision and any approved exceptions before release.

02 Environment and Ownership

Agree the Data Flow

Use approved systems and access under your identity controls. Document hosting, model endpoints, logging and any data movement with IT and QA before implementation.

Handover and Support

Receive the agreed source, specifications, test records, operating guidance and training. List client-owned deliverables, pre-existing components, third-party licenses and support terms in the statement of work.

Before You Commission a Build

Your First Engagement,
at a Glance.

Start with a free 30-minute scope conversation. Bring a description of the workflow, platform, bottleneck and review owner. No study files are needed for this first call.

Scope and Timing

One defined workflow. If discovery is needed, the indicative review duration is two to four weeks, subject to scope and access.

Your Team’s Part

Name a workflow owner and the relevant programming, platform and QA reviewers. Agree workshops, access and reviewer availability before starting.

What the Review Delivers

A prioritized plan, readiness gaps, proposed acceptance criteria, and an implementation scope and estimate. Your team keeps the review outputs.

Fee and Build Decision

Review a written scope and fee before any paid work. Implementation is a separate decision, with its deliverables, timing and acceptance agreed in advance.

Clinical / Your Next Decision

Agree the Scope and Acceptance Roles.

A fit conversation establishes the problem and prerequisites. A separately scoped review can define the plan, estimate and validation approach before you decide on implementation.

30-Minute Scope Conversation

Bring One Workflow.

Useful Context for the Call

The workflow owner, validation responsibilities, readiness gaps and target milestone.

Choose a time on Calendly. Any assessment or build is agreed separately.

If You Proceed

The agreed source and specifications, test evidence, change records, operating guidance and handover. Qualification documentation is included where scoped.

  1. 01
    Confirm the Fit

    Discuss the workflow, readiness and the person responsible.

  2. 02
    Agree the Scope

    Review deliverables, responsibilities, timing and fees in writing.

  3. 03
    Decide Whether to Proceed

    Agree the evidence and review criteria before authorizing the work.

Built for Your Team to Operate.

Receive the agreed source or configuration, specifications, test records and operating handover. The statement of work identifies client-owned deliverables, existing INNOVIZZ methods, third-party licenses and support terms.

Clinical Engagement Brief PDF · 1 page